Help me get to the bottom of the 85 to SN95 suspension swap please..
Reply #7 –
Chuck, I remember reading that the '86 through '88 cars had the longer SN95 style arms, though I have no real world data to prove it. I CAN say however that ANY car with the Mustang style mounts (k member) does indeed have the shorter CA's.
I've only ever seen the longer arms on those cars with that k member...that is, the one that has the mounts that bolt to the K member with the long horizontal bolt. '86-88.
And to the OP...there's differences that will play into effect between the Sn95 spindles too. '94-'95 are different than the '96-04. I won't go into much detail here as it's covered extensively elsewhere here, but the general consensus is that stock ride height cars are best served with '94-5 spindles, and lowered cars with bumpsteer kits can use the '96 and up stuff with good results. Wheel backspacing might be a consideration, as the '96+ spindles will move the wheel and track width out by a half inch or even 3/4 inch or thereabouts. I ran the 94-95 stuff on an '88 Sport with Bullitt wheels from an '04 and they fit perfect, was using SN95 springs...seems like from a '97 GT...was about perfect in terms of ride height and tire placement. No rubbing.