Those who have done the HO conversion December 03, 2008, 06:38:30 PM Did you check the piston/valve clearance?If so, how did you do it. (clay method)?Ive been getting conflicting information on the net, about the e7's only being safe about 50% of the time, with the flat top pistons.Mike Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #1 – December 03, 2008, 06:47:35 PM With a stock H.O cam and the E-7 heads,you should be good to go.You should check the PTV clearance,though.I used clay.Had lot's of room left.The E303 is a little closer with the flat tops. Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #2 – December 03, 2008, 06:54:56 PM my current engine has a b cam and it ahs nearly a 1/4 of room well over an 1/8th for sure. I ran a 302 in my mustang with flat tops and a steeda #18 cam with no problems. used clay both times. Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #3 – December 03, 2008, 07:44:17 PM Look here and look under info. A lot of ?? can be answerd here. http://coolcats.net/ Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #4 – December 03, 2008, 07:49:23 PM Quote from: Kitz Kat;246024Look here and look under info. A lot of ?? can be answerd here. http://coolcats.net/Yea, Ive already read that several times. Ive also read on mustang forums of people with 86's (same as our motor, flat-top wise) having problems switching to E7's.That is why I wanted to get it from the "horses" mouth with you guys.The HO cams were revised slightly each year, do you think that could attribute to some difference? Should I check wich HO cam I have?Mike Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #5 – December 03, 2008, 10:05:22 PM I've said it once, I'll say it a thousand more times...S.O. pistons are dished...not flat tops...can we just get a sticky that's titled "SO PISTONS ARE DISHED"?...85/86 HO's as well as some early 87's in Mark VII's are the only true flat-topped piston 5.0's. Even on those engines, E7's are fine with a stock HO cam...which gained 10* of duration on the intake side in late '88...both early and late cams work just fine.Good luck,Don Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #6 – December 03, 2008, 10:12:11 PM I have true flat tops,E303,and ported E-7 heads.Rockin' !!! Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #7 – December 03, 2008, 10:50:45 PM E7's are virtally identical to E6's which is what is on our cars stock. The only real difference is the emissions bump. Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #8 – December 03, 2008, 11:14:30 PM Quote from: Haystack;246062E7's are virtally identical to E6's which is what is on our cars stock. The only real difference is the emissions bump.But wasn't the only change for the stock Mustang HO switching from E6 to E7? It got an extra MPG and 25 extra horses from that swap.... or am I missing something important? If so, it wouldn't be the first time for me! Quote Selected
Those who have done the HO conversion Reply #9 – December 04, 2008, 01:04:02 AM Quote from: Haystack;246062E7's are virtally identical to E6's which is what is on our cars stock. The only real difference is the emissions bump.They are absolutely not virtually identical...entirely different combustion chambers...the E6 was Ford's early attempt at a high-swirl combustion chamber...the exhaust ports flow nearly the same...it's the intake side that is the real bottleneck...20-50cfm down on the E7's depending on test conditions. Switching from E6's to E7's will not only improve flow, but bump compression also...which helps when you have an 8.4:1 C/R. However the work involved with slappin' E7's on isn't really worth the marginal gain...iron GT40's or "P" heads FTW!BTW, vinnie, was it you who previously described your pistons as "flat like kansas flat"? lol, if so, excellent description-Don Quote Selected